You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Rank Correlational Analysis with Goodman and Kruskal’s Gamma (γ) of BIMTM-FB and convergent measures

From: Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Body Image Matrix of Thinness and Muscularity – Female Bodies

Measures Sample BMI BAS DLS DMS
  S1:N = 398; S2:N = 179     
BIMTM-FB-BF
 Actual S1 .73*** −.18*** −.18*** −.02
S2 .81*** −.12 −.11 .06
 Felt S1 .59*** −.38*** −.09 .05
S2 .64*** −.35*** .03 .18**
 Ideal S1 .61*** .09 −.38*** −.15**
S2 .45*** .40*** −.41*** −.25**
BIMTM-FB-M
 Actual S1 .16** −.02 .15** .13**
S2 .09 .11 .15 .02
 Felt S1 .18*** −.02 .14*** .13*
S2 .13 .15 .14 .00
 Ideal S1 .02 −.01 .29*** .33***
S2 −.06 −.14* .37*** .27***
  1. Note. BIMTM-FB-BF = body fat dimension of the Body Image Matrix of Thinness and Muscularity (with the perceived actual, felt, and ideal body); BIMTM-FB-M = muscularity dimension of the Body Image Matrix of Thinness and Muscularity (with the perceived actual, felt, and ideal body); BMI = Body Mass Index; BAS = Body Appreciation Scale; DLS = Drive for Leanness Scale; DMS = Drive for Muscularity Scale. S1 = online-sample, S2 = student-sample (paper-pencil); * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974