You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Family-based treatment – anorexia nervosa

From: Canadian practice guidelines for the treatment of children and adolescents with eating disorders

Certainty assessmentImpactCertaintyImportance
№ of studiesStudy designRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerations
FBT vs supportive/dynamic individual– outcomes - Remission (assessed with: attaining target weight, good outcome category) Weight gain
 3randomised trialsnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnoneOne meta-analysis indicated superiority of FBT at 6- and 12- month follow up. Three RCTs 43/90 (47.8%) with good outcome or in full remission with FBT, compared to 26/89 (29.2%) in Individual group. Total n = 179.
HIGH
CRITICAL
not seriousnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnoneWeight gain greater in the FBT group compared to individual therapy group at end of treatment.
HIGH
CRITICAL
RCT (FBT vs CBT) Remission/Good Outcome (assessed with: Morgan Russell Scale)
 1randomised trialsnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnone7/13 (53.8%) had a good outcome in FBT group vs. 7/12 (58.3%) in the CBT group. No significant difference.
HIGH
CRITICAL
Weight Gain (assessed with: kg and %IBW)
 1Case controlserious bnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnoneOne case control retrospective chart review. 32 treated with FBT model compared to 14 in nonspecific therapy. Those in FBT made greater gains in weight.
VERY LOW
CRITICAL
Weight (assessed with: kg)
 7Case seriesvery serious a,bnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnone7 large case series (total n = 223). Of these, 32 were children under age 13. Weight was significantly improved, pre to post.
VERY LOW
CRITICAL
Weight (assessed with: kg)
 11Case reportsvery serious a,bnot seriousnot seriousnot seriousnone11 case reports detailing 29 patients who restored weight with FBT. Some described twins, comorbid conversion disorder, FBT within a group home setting, or FBT starting on a medical unit or use of FBT combined with medication.
VERY LOW
CRITICAL
  1. Bibliography:
  2. RCTs - Russell 1987 [6], Lock 2010 [23], Robin 1999 [22] (compared to psychodynamic individual)
  3. RCT – Ball 2004 [24] (compared to CBT)
  4. Case Control -Gusella 2017 [25]
  5. Case Series - Paulson-Karlsson 2009 [26], Lock 2006 [27], Le Grange 2005 [28], Loeb 2007 [29], Goldstein 2016 [30], Couturier 2010 [31], Herscovici 1996 [32]
  6. Case Reports – Le Grange 1999 [33], Le Grange 2003 [34], Loeb 2009 [35], Sim 2004 [36], Krautter 2004 [37], Aspen 2014 [38], Matthews 2016 [39], Turkiewicz 2010 [40], O’Neil 2012 [41], Duvvuri 2012 [42], Goldstein 2013[43]